Mr Putin…
It is obvious that some OLD minded Elit….
ie The Jewish/Sion New World Era… fanatics have lost their minds!
as they have become the Bad Guys!
Against democracy, against Declared Freedoms/ civil rights, against freedom of speech…
NO Jewish/ EXTREMIST/ FANATIC is Entitled to speak for Democracy’s stake! neither about Human Civilization!
Their destiny is written in their text books… The ‘Babel’ Tower is their destiny!
Jewish/Sion fake Medical experts humiliate Medicine, science.. etc
These Jewish/ Scientists will insist that 2+2= 5!
I remind them that the Universal constant is π (pi)… unless they want to change that as well…
They are Jewish fanatics and nothing more!!!!
JEWISH/ FANATICS With Lots of Money To Looose!
This is how I see them!
It is up to Homo Sapiens who by definition are the “wise” men… with Free will to save Planet earth from this insanity!
Syria was the big Fiasco for the Omaba/ Bidden administration…
and with a remake by forgery today…
Syria will be a Fiasco for Bidden once again!
The Omaba clowns are the same!
Just a note under Mr Trump’s administration there was no war for four years!
Now these Omaba clowns/ fake Democrats/ fake liberals “leftists”…
from their first week try to reopen a dead front… from even worst position!
with no infantry, and without their allies ISIS… american blood will be poored in vain…
Their defense Secretary has the Syria fiasco in his resume! Once a looser always a looser!
Plus they do not have the support of the USA people…
and with the election fraud/ irregularities/ forgery shadows above them…
they certainly do not represent Democracy… rather an UN democratic regime… a paralegal cult that they are!
since you disagree with me i respect that! I am entitle of my opinion… and of course I am not here to educate no body!
Since no audit was done to the american voter irregularities/ scam… to verify voter identity/ signatures/ address and left …this huge matter under the carpet…for democracy quality audit…
it is something that will always be under them!
We will pull the carpet from their feet…
To remind them how powerless they ARE!
Because… the Enemies of Democracy support vote by mail scam/ fraud…
with signature forgery ballots/envelops!
…documents that are official federal documents!
These people can not point fingers about other’s more Democratic States/ counties
another NEW Term that we will encounter these days…
The Humanoid!
The Person that did the gene treatment for covid Pfizer mRNA treatment).
Because it is not a vaccine!
and…
Because like the Hybrid Tomatoes, Weed, corn etc… that have been genetically modified (mosad) he/ she is NO longer a HOMO Sapiens…
BUT a Hybrid Humanoid!
All your Arguments will be based on these three words!!!:
“Of the methods of influence suitable for the spoken word there are three sorts. The main kind relies upon the individual character of the speaker; the second on instilling a specific emotion in the audience; the third on the verification, or evident confirmation, given by the expressions of the discourse itself.”
Ethos pathos Logos: Which One is More Powerful?
Ethos Pathos Logos: In everyday life, we are constantly faced with the necessity to influence others: whether these are our employers or employees, our coworkers or associates, our teachers, students or children. Needless to say that important organizations are always on the look out for people who can persuade large audiences including their social media followers! Persuasion (or the art of) is the foundation of almost all civilized human activity based on discourse. Educating ourselves about this unique ability is essential. So, why not start with the teachings of the ‘master of persuasion’ as Aristotle has often been called?
Ethos Pathos Logos: Good sense should direct us, at that point, to get the hang of something about influence. We should take an excerpt from Aristotle’s Rhetoric:
Ethos Pathos Logos: These three methods of influence can be called individually ETHOS (ΗΘΟΣ*—manner or character), passion… PATHOS (ΠΑΘΟΣ*—feeling or energy), and LOGOS (ΛΟΓΟΣ*—reason). Aristotle expounded on his meaning of every one of these sorts.
Ethos Pathos Logos: The Greek names of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos date back to Aristotle’s ‘Rhetoric’: they constitute the three methods for convincing others to trust a specific perspective. They are regularly utilized in discourse about written composition or public oration used to influence a group of readers/listeners.
Ethos Pathos Logos. Aristotle utilized these three terms to clarify how a narration/speech functions:
“Of the methods of influence outfitted by the spoken word there are three sorts. The main kind relies upon the individual character of the speaker [ethos]; the second on putting the gathering of people into a specific temper [pathos]; the third on the confirmation, or obvious verification, given by the expressions of the discourse itself [logos]. Influence is accomplished by the speaker’s character when the discourse is presented in such as way as so make us think of him as an authority.”
Ethos (once in a while called also ‘morals’), at that point, is utilized as a method for persuading a group of people by means of the credibility of the persuader, be it a prominent or experienced figure in the field.
Passion (claim to feelings or emotions) is a method for persuading a group of people by offering a strong, emotional reaction (even a story) to an ardent request of this group.
Logos (offer to rationale) is a method for influencing people with reason, utilizing statistical data points (facts and figures).
Ethos Pathos Logos: Aristotle joins Plato in condemning contemporary manuals of oration (speech). And yet, for Aristotle, speech is an impartial instrument that can be utilized by people of idealistic or debased character.
Ethos Pathos Logos: Aristotle discloses to us that it is difficult to find such a ‘correct’ crowd of people, regardless of whether the speaker is an authority on the subject. Clearly he imagines that the group of listeners of an open discourse comprises of common individuals who are not ready to pursue evidence dependent on the standards of science. Further, such a group of people can undoubtedly be diverted by honeyed words or simply attempt to expand their own leverage. If the fate of a city-state (back then, now a country) is at stake, circumstances can turn out to be far more detestable. Finally, a large portion of the points that are generally talked about out in the open discourses don’t permit the presentation of correct information, leaving space for uncertainty; in such cases, it is really critical that the speaker is by all accounts an individual of true ethics (ethos comes at play here) and that the gathering of people is in a thoughtful mind-set. For each one of those reasons, influencing the choices of juries and gatherings involves enticement (pathos), not just the correct information (logos). The facts demonstrate that a few people figure out how to be enticing. The proper use of rhetorical means however is what gives us a powerful strategy for influencing an audience.
Ethos Pathos Logos:
Ethos or the moral aspect of a speech (ethos is the Greek word for “character”), intends to persuade a group of people of the creator’s credibility or character. “Ethics” derives from ethos. A speaker would utilize ethos to show to a gathering of people that he/she is a believable source. Ethos can be further emphasized by picking dialect that is suitable for the crowd and subject (additionally implies picking appropriate level of vocabulary). Today, the term ethos is used by writers as well.
Pathos (passion or emotion) is used to stir the feelings of the gatherers. This article will examine how powerful is this tool when used wisely.
Logos is the Greek word for “word” or “reason.” Logos or the appeal to rationale and intends to persuade a group of people by using reason. Utilizing logos means to refer to actualities and insights, recorded and exacting analogies.
Ethos Pathos Logos: they are all fundamental in convincing readers or an audience.
Ethos Pathos Logos: The Three Means of Persuasion.
Ethos Pathos Logos. The systematical center of Aristotle’s Rhetoric is the precept that there are three specialized methods for influence. According to Aristotle, a discourse comprises of three things: the speaker, the subject that is treated in the discourse, and the audience to whom the discourse is tended to (Rhet. I.3, 1358a37ff.). Yet just three specialized methods for influence are conceivable: technical methods for influence are either (1) in the character of the speaker (ethos), or (2) in the passionate condition of the listener (pathos), or (3) in the contention itself (logos).
Ethos Pathos Logos. Ethos: Aristotle argues that the influence is refined by the character of the speaker: it is therefore the speaker who appears as deserving of trustworthiness or not. On the off chance that the speaker has all the earmarks of being dependable, the gathering of people will frame an additional judgment that determines whether the recommendations set forward by the speaker are valid or worthy. Aristotle closes, that the speaker must achieve this impact on his audience by what he says.
Ethos is built on the authority of the speaker. With the end goal to draw in a crowd of people on a specific theme, the individual introducing the data should initially build up him or herself as somebody that can be trusted, or as somebody who has a great deal of involvement with the subject. This is otherwise called morals.
Ethos bids to:
• Intelligence
• Virtue
• Morals
• Perception of dependability
Ethos Pathos Logos. Pathos: The achievement of the powerful endeavors relies upon the enthusiastic response of the audience; for we don’t make a decision similarly when we lament or when we celebrate.
Therefore, the speaker needs to stimulate feelings precisely on the ground that feelings have the ability to influence our judgments. Numerous translators were confused by the use of the term ‘feelings’ (pathos) in Aristotle’s morals: they recommended that the speaker needs to stimulate the feelings all together. How is it feasible for the speaker to convey the group of listeners to a specific feeling? Aristotle’s method basically lays on the learning of the meaning of each critical feeling. The speaker who needs to stimulate feelings must not talk outside the subject; it is adequate to recognize parts of a given subject that are causally associated with the planned feeling.
Ethos Pathos Logos. Pathos gets to the feelings and profoundly held convictions of the group of listeners to draw them into the topic. Furthermore, passion frequently makes crowds feel like they have an individual stake in the data being given and is regularly the impetus that drives them vigorously.
Pathos appeals to:
• Emotions and feelings
• Biases and preferences
• Senses
• Motivations
Ethos Pathos Logos. Logos:
Logos utilizes rationale, thinking, proof, and realities to help a contention. Logos appeals to the more reasonable side of the group of listeners’ psyches, and offers help on the topic in the form of given data. Logos methodologies can frequently be utilized to fortify the effect feeling has on the audience.
Logos uses:
• Evidence
• Testimony
• Statistics and Data
• Universal facts
Ethos pathos Logos: Which One is More Powerful?
Ethos Pathos Logos: In everyday life, we are constantly faced with the necessity to influence others: whether these are our employers or employees, our coworkers or associates, our teachers, students or children. Needless to say that important organizations are always on the look out for people who can persuade large audiences including their social media followers! Persuasion (or the art of) is the foundation of almost all civilized human activity based on discourse. Educating ourselves about this unique ability is essential. So, why not start with the teachings of the ‘master of persuasion’ as Aristotle has often been called?
Ethos Pathos Logos: Good sense should direct us, at that point, to get the hang of something about influence. We should take an excerpt from Aristotle’s Rhetoric:
“Of the methods of influence suitable for the spoken word there are three sorts. The main kind relies upon the individual character of the speaker; the second on instilling a specific emotion in the audience; the third on the verification, or evident confirmation, given by the expressions of the discourse itself.”
Ethos Pathos Logos: These three methods of influence can be called individually ethos (ΗΘΟΣ*—manner or character), passion (ΠΑΘΟΣ*—feeling or energy), and logos (ΛΟΓΟΣ*—reason). Aristotle expounded on his meaning of every one of these sorts.
• Ethos needs to do with your identity and how you act ‘ethically.’ Aristotle would incorporate both the manner by which you talk and your individual character or honesty in this classification. As he expressed, “We trust great men more completely and more promptly than others.”
• Pathos includes blending in with individuals’ feelings. It incorporates requests to individuals’ pity, outrage, dread, trust, and so forth. An example: politicians, when corrupt, will use the method of ‘incoming threat’ to push their dark agendas.
• Logos is the utilization of reason. This classification incorporates contentions, information, measurements, and a wide range of thinking. No written scientific paper, fr example, can be successful without an ample use of logos.
Which of these three methods of influence is generally ground-breaking?
Ethos Pathos Logos: Aristotle didn’t think much about the emotional interest (pathos). He stated, “The exciting of bias, pity, outrage, and comparative feelings has nothing to do with the basic realities, however is only a subjective opinion of the man who is making a decision about the case.” He likewise invested little energy in the moral interest. Rather he thought the consistent logical approach was the most critical, in light of the fact that he considered speech as identified with argument. For Aristotle, the syllogism was the best type of influence.
All things considered, I think ethos is the essential method of influence, and one which we disregard at our risk.
Consider for a minute how you have been convinced. When you were a student, which instructor affected you the most? Presumably the one whose character and communication with students you found generally engaging. Which products do you trust the most? Most likely the ones with the best ‘ethics’ as used in their production line of their brand. Which researchers are the most convincing? Not just the ones who publish the most honored articles, but the ones who have associations with different researchers.
Indeed, the moral aspect (ethos) is as yet the entryway to every other sort of influence. Concerning argumentation (logos), Aristotle stated, “Argumentation (logos) dependent on learning infers guidance, and there are individuals whom one can’t teach.” We ought to abstain from applying the cynicism in the second part of that sentence to our students or associates. All things considered, the point remains that coherent argumentation requires the gathering of people (or an audience) to have a base of prior instruction. Without the strength coming from ethos, you’re probably not going to be allowed a meeting on legitimate grounds.
To put it plainly, being powerful is on a very basic level a matter of morals. There is no piece of your work as a researcher, educator, and partner that isn’t wrapped up in your character as a man or woman. How you answer to peoples’ messages matters. The politeness or rudeness with which you treat your associates matters. The polished methodology with which you present yourself matters. How liberal or not you are in academic discussions matters. Your entire personality identifies your ethos (or not); you are constantly being judged by your ethos (or lack of it).
Aristotle made this point as well. He recognized the ethical rhetorician and the malicious pedant, not by how capable they were at influence, but rather by the ethical purposes for which they endeavored to induce. The correct utilization of ethos to induce is a way to achieving our professional goals.
Ethos Pathos Logos: Summary and Conclusions.
Ethos Pathos Logos: Ethos, passion, and logos are three methods of persuasion. For those of you who contemplate on the meaning of speech, these three terms apply equally to both the oral and the written word. Aristotle, the Ancient Greek philosopher, recognized three devices that orators can use to influence a group of people. He called these the means of ethos, pathos, and logos since speakers utilize them to engage a crowd of people and win their approval.
All in all, for what reason would it be advisable for you to mind? All things considered, on the off chance that you comprehend in depth ethos, pathos, and logos, these three methods can enable you to construct a more powerful presentation. It will likewise make you more mindful of how a speaker or essayist is addressing you. Once in a while these methods can be utilized to control the gathering of people; however the more you know about them, the more you can keep your mind about you and assess your presentation (or argument) objectively and soundly. How about we investigate each one ot them separately.
Ethos Pathos Logos: Ethos implies character, and the moral interest requests that the crowd accepts that the speaker or essayist is a man (or woman) of good character. The speaker or essayist says basically, “I am a great individual. I have a great character. I have positive attitude towards you. I possess good judgment. Along these lines, you ought to trust me.”
For instance, would you join the armed forces of your country when at war? All things considered, it IS your homeland and it certainly needs your assistance at a very difficult time: the ethos to defend your own people is a given. Note that citizens of some countries still take an oath the same way as their ancestors did: “to give their lives in defense of their country till their last drop of blood” (case of Ancient AND Modern Greece).
Ethos Pathos Logos: We should investigate emotion (pathos). Poignancy invigorates feeling in a group of people. It advances to the heart, not the head. There are documentaries, for instance, that evoke pity or compassion towards tortured people or animals: if the director of the film uses pathos effectively, he/she makes the watcher need to cry, go out and protect each creature, or both.
Another example: many hospitals may appear on your Facebook “wall” requesting that you like their Facebook page: they usually present real tragic cases of people (or children) with severe health issues. One look and your heart needs you to discover a PC ASAP in light of the fact that, in the event that you don’t, the picture will remain in your brain until the point when you do as such.
Ethos Pathos Logos: The last means is logos. While passion appeals to the heart, logos advances to the head. At the point when utilized well, the consistent interest gives a very much bolstered contention. Some of the time however it just recommends rationale. A specific milk brand, for example, recommends that drinking milk will give you super powers on account of the calcium. I mean you are not going to have the capacity to fly through the sky after a tall glass of milk, however do take the time to contemplates the purpose (sales of the product) behind it; that alone will make you more grounded. All things considered, couple of advertisements lay on legitimate interest alone, and most utilize every one of the “three means of persuasion” quite effectively.
Rome, Italy. Bust statue of Pythagoras, famous philosopher, mathematician and scientist. Sculpture in Villa Borghese park.
“through music and music cognition of the numerical structure of the Cosmos”
The numerical structure TETRAKTYS was symbolically expressed in the (” quaternions “), the amount of the first four numbers 1 +2 +3 +4 = 10, containing the basic musical intervals: the octave (2:1), quinte (3:2) and a quart (4:3).
Pythagoras ascribed to the idea of the sphericity of the Earth (among other considerations, he probably was guided by the idea of symmetry between the shape of the Earth and the celestial sphere).
It is believed that Pythagoras identified the Morning and Evening Star (Hesperus and Phosphorus) from Venus.
He introduced a geometric division of the celestial sphere into zones (arctic, tropical, etc.) and the Earth.
Furthermore, it seems that Pythagoras was the first who gave to the world the wide name “space”.
He is also the author/creator of the word “philosophy”.
Pythagoras probed the cosmos with mathematics and observation, introduced number as a fundamental constituent of the cosmos.
This started a tradition of using geometry in measuring and understanding the natural world and the cosmos.
The Pythagorean theorem (the square of the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle equals to the sum of the squares of the other two sides of the triangle) mirrored that tradition.
The Golden Ratio, Spiral… harmony…
Pythagoras thought of the Earth and the other heavenly bodies as spheres moving around an invisible fire at the center of the universe.
He connected the mathematical ratios of the sounds he heard from his monochord musical instrument to the music of the spheres in the heavens.
He blended music, mathematics and astronomy in his search for harmony in the cosmos, a perfect, beautiful, and eternal world of stars governed by natural laws and order.
Pythagoras united the heavens and the Earth. He helped his students understand the movement of the heavenly spheres; he shed light on the eclipses of the sun and the moon.
He guided his listeners to reading the night sky and studying astronomy for a better understanding of the geometry, beauty and harmony of the heavens.
Over the last year, Elon Musk has been having more and more red pill moments. This time it was triggered by big tech and their power over freedom of speech.Do you blame him?On Monday, responding to a story satirizing Big Tech censorship, Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and the CEO of Tesla and Space X, tweeted, “A lot of people are going to be super unhappy with West Coast high tech as the de facto arbiter of free speech.”source: https://thinkamericana.com/red-pill-moment-elon-musk-big-tech/…………………………………………………………….My quote on Freedom of speech and the current election fraud voting by mail scam:“Homo Sapiens Have Freedom of Will, Freedom of Speech…and Democracy! Democracy is the election process!Democracy is the Constitution!The “fascistic” mentality of the West Coast High Techs has exceed their role of Existence!The same mentality resides withing the FBI/ NSA and all the surveillance “EYE” censoring networkps: “monkeys” have NO HISTORY, NO PAST, NO FUTURE!they have sold their conscience/ will/ soul to… ???
You must be logged in to post a comment.